Restoring Government’s Core Mission in Mat-Su Borough

Service, Not Social Engineering – Dana Raffaniello for Mat-Su Borough Assembly

Service, Not Social Engineering

Restoring Government’s Core Mission in Mat-Su Borough

Dana Raffaniello for Mat-Su Borough Assembly, District 2

Executive Summary: The Mission Drift Crisis

Local government exists to provide essential services—roads, police, fire, emergency medical services, utilities, and infrastructure. These are the foundational functions that justify taxation and public trust. Yet increasingly, our public institutions are being hijacked by activist agendas that transform schools into ideological battlegrounds and libraries into litigation minefields.

The result is predictable: mission drift, service degradation, and institutional paralysis.

When government tries to parent our children, engineer social outcomes, and impose ideological conformity, it stops doing what it’s actually supposed to do—serve the public efficiently, constitutionally, and impartially.

This policy outlines a clear alternative: return government to its core functions, protect taxpayers from activist litigation, and restore community trust through transparency and service excellence.

Respecting the Will of the People: Term Limits and Democratic Accountability

The District 1 Model vs. The District 2 Problem

Leadership legitimacy flows from the consent of the governed—not from incumbent entrenchment. District 1’s incumbent, at the end of his second term, chose not to run again, honoring the spirit of term limits and respecting the voice of the people who favored rotation in leadership.

In contrast, my opponent in District 2 is seeking a third term, despite clear public sentiment favoring new leadership.

This is not merely a political calculation—it is a disrespect to the democratic rhythm of our borough and a signal that personal agenda has overtaken public service.

When Officials Ignore the People’s Will

The pattern is unmistakable: When an office holder ignores the will of the people and clings to power beyond reasonable tenure, it reveals their true priority—advancing their personal agenda rather than serving as the people’s representative.

This matters because:

  • Entrenchment breeds detachment: Long-serving officials become insulated from community concerns and accountable only to special interests
  • Agenda over service: Officials who overstay their welcome are pursuing their vision, not the voters’ will
  • Democratic fatigue: When the same voices dominate year after year, civic engagement atrophies and trust erodes
  • Institutional capture: Extended tenure allows officials to stack boards, control processes, and shape institutions to reflect their ideology rather than community values
“The office belongs to the people—not to the person occupying it. When officials forget this, they transform from servants into rulers.”

My Commitment

I support voluntary term limits and will advocate for formal mechanisms to ensure elected officials do not entrench themselves against the will of the voters. If elected, I will serve with the understanding that:

  • The people’s voice matters more than my ambitions
  • Fresh perspectives strengthen governance
  • Democratic rotation prevents institutional capture
  • Service means knowing when to step aside

Public office is a temporary trust, not a permanent entitlement.

The Core Services Mandate

Public Safety

Police, fire, EMS, emergency preparedness

Infrastructure

Roads, water, sewer, drainage, snow removal

Land Use

Zoning, building codes, property records

Parks & Recreation

Trails, facilities, community spaces

Administrative Services

Elections, assessments, tax collection

These services are non-partisan, non-ideological, and universally necessary. They don’t require government to take positions on social issues, impose values on families, or override parental authority.

What Government Should Not Do

Government should not:

  • Act as a surrogate parent, making decisions about children’s identity, values, or beliefs
  • Use public institutions to advance activist social agendas
  • Override community standards in the name of “progress” or “inclusion”
  • Expose taxpayers to endless litigation by importing culture war controversies
  • Prioritize ideological conformity over operational excellence
“If it’s not about delivering services efficiently and constitutionally, it’s not government’s job.”

Lawfare: The Weaponization of Process Against Constitutional Governance

Beyond mission drift in libraries and schools, we face a more insidious threat: the weaponization of legal process to intimidate, distract, and delegitimize elected officials who refuse to bow to activist agendas.

Case Study: The Charlie Kirk Memorial Complaint

The recent attempt to weaponize the Alaska Public Offices Commission (APOC) against the Mat-Su Borough is a textbook example of lawfare in action.

The Attack:

After the borough honored Charlie Kirk—a prominent conservative voice who was assassinated—in a memorial within the borough’s election guide, leftist activists filed a complaint with APOC claiming this was a partisan political act that violated election laws.

The Reality:

APOC thoroughly investigated and rejected the complaint entirely, finding that:

  • The memorial was nonpartisan and appropriate
  • Honoring a public figure who died tragically is not a political endorsement
  • The borough acted within its authority and violated no laws
  • The complaint was baseless and politically motivated

The Tactic:

This was never about legitimate legal concerns. It was about:

  • Intimidation: Making officials afraid to take any action that might draw activist ire
  • Distraction: Forcing the borough to spend time and resources defending obviously proper conduct
  • Delegitimization: Creating a public narrative that the borough is “under investigation” or “controversial”
  • Chilling Effect: Discouraging future officials from honoring conservative figures or standing firm on traditional values

The Broader Pattern

The Charlie Kirk complaint is not isolated—it’s part of a coordinated strategy to use legal processes as political weapons:

  • Libraries: Leftist groups file lawsuits demanding sexually explicit materials be placed in children’s sections, then claim “censorship” when communities resist
  • Schools: Activist organizations threaten litigation if districts don’t implement gender ideology policies, then sue when parents demand notification rights
  • Elections: Frivolous ethics complaints are filed against officials who refuse to advance progressive agendas, forcing them to defend actions that are clearly lawful
  • Public Speech: Any acknowledgment of conservative values or traditional beliefs is labeled “hate speech” or “discrimination,” with legal threats following immediately
$$$

Taxpayer Dollars Wasted on Frivolous Defense

⚖️

Legal Intimidation Instead of Governance

🛑

Paralyzed Decision-Making

Fighting Back: A Strategy Against Lawfare

I will not be intimidated by activist litigation or frivolous complaints. If elected, I will:

1. Defend Constitutional Governance Aggressively

The borough has every right to honor public figures, maintain community standards, and reflect the values of its residents. I will support vigorous legal defense against frivolous complaints and activist lawsuits. We will not surrender to intimidation or settle cases just to avoid controversy.

2. Expose Lawfare Tactics Publicly

When activists file baseless complaints, we will call them out by name. We will educate voters about who is behind these campaigns and what their real agenda is. Sunlight is the best disinfectant—transparency defeats intimidation.

3. Build Coalition Defense

Partner with other Alaska boroughs facing similar attacks. Coordinate legal strategies and share resources. Support state legislation to protect local governments from frivolous litigation.

4. Establish Clear Legal Standards

Adopt policies that are clearly constitutional and defensible. Document decision-making processes thoroughly. Maintain legal opinions supporting our actions.

5. Never Apologize for Constitutional Governance

Honoring Charlie Kirk was appropriate and legal—APOC confirmed it. Protecting children from explicit materials is required by Alaska law. Respecting parental rights is a constitutional obligation. We will not apologize for doing what’s right just because activists object.

The Principle at Stake

Lawfare only works if officials surrender to intimidation. The goal is not to win in court—it’s to win through exhaustion, making governance so painful that officials just give in.

I refuse to give in.

When elected officials allow activist lawsuits to dictate policy, they stop representing voters and start representing whoever can afford the most lawyers. That’s not democracy—that’s oligarchy by litigation.

“If they want a fight, they’ll get one—and we will win, just like we won when APOC slapped down the Charlie Kirk complaint.”

Libraries: From Community Asset to Legal Liability

Public libraries should be safe, welcoming spaces for literacy, learning, and community access. But activist litigation has turned them into culture war flashpoints.

The Problem:

  • Leftist groups file lawsuits demanding that libraries include sexually explicit and ideologically charged materials in collections accessible to minors
  • These materials often violate Alaska Statute § 11.61.128, which prohibits distributing indecent content to minors
  • Borough staff are caught between activist demands and community standards, creating legal exposure from both directions
  • Library resources are diverted from literacy programs, technology access, and community events to legal defense and culture war compliance

The Solution:

Assembly member Dee McKee’s pre-purchase review policy is a critical first step. I fully support this initiative and will work to strengthen it by:

  1. Establishing Clear Legal Standards: Materials must comply with Alaska law and community decency standards before purchase
  2. Enhancing Transparency: Monthly public posting of proposed acquisitions with clear review criteria
  3. Empowering Community Voice: Volunteer board includes parents, educators, and legal experts
  4. Implementing Tiered Access: Age-restricted materials available only in controlled adult sections
  5. Shielding Staff from Coercion: Clear policies protect librarians from activist pressure campaigns

This is not censorship—it’s constitutional stewardship and fiscal responsibility.

Schools: Ideology Over Education

Public schools exist to educate children in reading, writing, mathematics, science, history, and civic knowledge. They do not exist to undermine parental authority, override biological reality, or indoctrinate students in activist ideology.

The Problem:

  • Schools are implementing policies that exclude parents from critical decisions about their children’s gender identity, pronouns, and social transitions
  • Female students are losing access to female-only sports and bathrooms as biological boundaries are erased
  • Teachers and administrators spend time navigating ideological minefields instead of focusing on academic excellence
  • Curriculum transparency has been replaced by secrecy and bureaucratic deflection
  • Fear of litigation paralyzes decision-making and prevents common-sense policies

The Solution:

Return schools to their core educational mission by:

  1. Guaranteeing Parental Rights: Full notification and consent required for any gender-related interventions, pronoun changes, or identity discussions
  2. Protecting Female Spaces: Maintain sex-separated sports, bathrooms, and locker rooms based on biological sex, consistent with Title IX
  3. Ensuring Curriculum Transparency: Parents must have full access to curricula, reading lists, and lesson plans
  4. Refocusing on Academics: Measure schools by educational outcomes—test scores, graduation rates, college/career readiness—not ideological compliance
  5. Supporting Teachers: Protect educators from being forced to participate in or promote ideologies that conflict with their professional judgment or personal beliefs
“Government schools must serve families, not supplant them.”

The Big Cabbage Radio Test

When I sat down with Big Cabbage Radio—a left-leaning station where I might never find agreement—I laid out this exact vision: Get social issues out of government. Focus on providing services. Roads, police, fire, EMS. Things we all need and can agree on.

The interviewer agreed.

That tells you something profound: This message transcends ideology. When you strip away the culture war noise and focus on competent, constitutional service delivery, you find common ground.

  • Libertarians want limited government that stays in its lane
  • Progressives want functional public services that work
  • Conservatives want respect for families and community values
  • Everyone wants roads that are plowed, police who respond, and government that isn’t trying to be their parent

This is not a partisan agenda—it’s a sanity agenda.

Five Principles for Service-First Governance

1. Constitutional Boundaries

Government must operate within legal limits, respecting both state law and community standards. No public institution should violate Alaska statutes in service of activist agendas.

2. Operational Focus

Measure success by service quality, not ideological compliance. Allocate resources to core functions, not culture war battles.

3. Transparency and Accountability

The public has a right to know what government is doing and why. Families have a right to know what their children are being exposed to.

4. Community Standards

Local values matter and should be reflected in public institutions. Mat-Su Borough should govern itself according to the will of Mat-Su residents.

5. Respect for Families

Parents, not government, are primary decision-makers for their children. Public institutions should support families, not supplant them.

Ready to Restore Constitutional Governance?

If you believe government should focus on services, not social engineering—vote Dana Raffaniello for Mat-Su Borough Assembly, District 2.

Home More Information on This Issue

Call to Action

If you believe that:

  • Government should focus on services, not social engineering
  • Parents, not bureaucrats, should make decisions about their children
  • Libraries should be safe community assets, not culture war battlegrounds
  • Schools should educate, not indoctrinate
  • Taxpayer dollars should fund roads and public safety, not activist litigation
  • Mat-Su Borough should reflect Mat-Su values

Then vote Dana Raffaniello for Mat-Su Borough Assembly, District 2.

Service. Transparency. Constitutional stewardship.

Let’s restore government’s core mission—together.

Paid for by Dana Raffaniello for Mat-Su Borough Assembly

↑